Skip to main content

Dear Google: Why me?



It is hard not to feel a little paranoid that Google have not, quite simply, got it in for me.


The saga begins in January. After testing and experimenting over a number of years with different email clients and configurations I finally felt I had arrived at a moment of almost transcendental synchronosity. I had my Thunderbird email client rigged up to receive all my email accounts as IMAP, and my work email was synchronised with my Google calendar via a nifty wee sync program called 'Google Sync' produced by Google for the purpose.  All my calendars were therefore synchronised together into a perfect harmony. For a blissful few months of trouble-free 'being organised'

Then on 30th January Google announced it would be withdrawing Google Sync and the whole house of cards collapsed in on itself.  I have managed to re-build some usability through Davmail - a little program which sits in-between your email client and Exchange - but I have spent many hours again trying (fruitlessly) to find alternative ways of reconciling my different calendars.

One way around the problem was to start using my Google calendar as a mechanism for organising my work time instead of dull old, isolated, Microsoft Exchange. After all, Google Mail calendars had a lovely option of posting events as 'Appointment Slots', which means other people can access and book slots - like for tutorials or meetings - on my Google calendar without actually having access to my personal data.

Marvellous.  If the cancellation of Google Sync meant that I could not synchronise my Exchange Calendar, then this meant that I could pretty much simply ignore my Exchange Calendar altogether!

And then, again at the end of January, Google withdrew the Appointment Slots option.

Bugger.  Back to the proverbial drawing board.

Still, at this point I was finding it difficult to be too angry at Google.  After all, I had just discovered a wonderful Google tool which made me feel a fool for not finding earlier. Google Reader was a fantastic way to subscribe to all my rss feeds (news websites, events updates, blogs, etc.) in one handy place. It was so easy to use and so flexible it was hard to imagine how I had managed without it all these years.

I happily signed up to all my various sources of information, and then used Google Reader's brilliant flexibility to feed those sources into my mobile phone, my blog, my VLE profile, etc..

Marvellous.

Then in March of this year, Google announced it would be 'retiring' Google Reader.

Dammit all.

What have I done to upset them?  Are they watching me, and merrily just cancelling anything I start to enjoy?  I am now half expecting Google to next announce that all they are pressurising governments to make coffee an illegal substance, to have all P. G. Wodehouse novels banned and (of course) to cancel Christmas.

Just a heads up then folks.  I have been using the Google search engine quite a lot lately...

...you have been warned.

Popular posts from this blog

2) Introduction to morphemes

So does language begin with words?

No. Language begins with sounds. It is important to understand this first and foremost. We have already raised this point, but it is worth raising again – language begins with sounds!

If I appear to be emphasizing this with a rather bizarre desperation, it is because it would be easy to think that since we are beginning our exploration of language and linguistics with words that this is where language begins. When you think about it logically though, all words are composed of various sounds grouped together. The word ‘cat’ is composed of three distinct sounds - /c/, /a/ and /t/.

So why aren’t we starting with looking at how sounds create language?

Well, in the not-too-distant past, when European football used to be free on the telly, Manchester United or Arsenal would jet off to Spain for a titanic contest with Barcelona. When the commentators referred to Barcelona, they would pronounce it ‘Bar-se-low-nah’ (bɑ:sɜ:ləʊnæ). After a few years th…

A fond farewell

Every time a new term starts, I find myself wondering what the hell happened to the supposed weeks inbetween?  We leap from teaching, to marking, to assessment boards to enrolments - and after all that, BANG!  Back in the classroom!  At which point we often start wishing there had been at least some time to prepare our classes...

But things have been rather different this time.  About a three months ago I was (admittedly to my own surprise) considered worthy enough to be offered an incredibly exciting job with the Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT) and the University of East London.  The regular whirlwind of activity over the Summer then, is having something of a more terminal period: Teaching, marking, assessment boards, enrolments and BANG! I'm walking out of Newham College for the last time!

It is now almost exactly 10 years since I joined Newham College.  The plan then was, at heart, very simple: The residents of Newham Borough represented a vast population …

Moodle looks rubbish: The myth that may be costing HE institutions

It was interesting, but not entirely surprising to read Phil Hill's blog on e-Literate suggesting a dramatic slow-down in the take-up of Moodle in HE Institutions.  Not surprising because there seems to be a myth about Moodle that has always flickered in dark corners and is fanned into flame by for-profit LMS providers at the nearest opportunity.

This myth is that Moodle looks rubbish.

Other LMS providers set up a course content page filled with as many html5 gadgets as they can imagine, and compare it to the most basic topic-format Moodle page.  "There we are!" they declare, "Look how rubbish Moodle looks compared to our system!  And in the modern world where students are using tablets and mobile phones more and more, isn't it important that your University LMS looks smart and contemporary?"

And so Universities look at these other LMS systems and think: 'Ooo, it has this, or it has that!  Our Moodle doesn't have them!'  Which in turn prompts a…