Skip to main content

Fornalism and Regulations

Today is turning into one of those days.  In the middle of working towards an institutional revalidation, pretty much my whole focus is currently locked onto a series of policy and regulatory documents in which I am writing all the various changes which have been agreed upon - which really means translating various minutes and discussions into appropriately 'regulatory' language which scrupulously avoids saying anything that contradicts a statement elsewhere in our regulations.  It involves laboriously cross-checking every sentence, and carefully scanning every punctuation mark to ensure that there is no obvious scope for misinterpretation.

The task is, frankly, mind-numbing - especially the week after I finally managed to dodge my way back into a classroom again, and had such a delightful time re-meeting old students and welcoming new ones.

One of the problems with regulations is that the mode of language which is used in them is so entrenched into a legalistic tone, that:

1)  Nobody willingly wants to read them;
2)  No wonder nobody wants to read them, because they are difficult and boring;
3)  If nobody wants to read them, there is an increased chance that nobody will follow them.

The question then is firstly how to accurately translate decisions and discussions into formal policy, and secondly how to translate policy back into something which people will actually read and understand.

Normally this involves writing a process handbook (although seriously, who the hell would voluntarily read something called a 'process handbook'?!).

But here is my problem.  Everything is so 'normal'.  It is all usual, and standard practice, because to do anything else would be to invite an auditor or an inspector to say 'this is not what I was expecting... I don't like it'.

Next week I am going to be introducing students to literary formalism.  To do so, I will be using the ideas of Victor Shklovsky.  Shklovsky made the argument that Art was simply a process of making things which are familiar, look unfamiliar.  In so doing, he argued, Art makes things look strange - and makes us pay attention to them.

I wonder - is there a way to do something similar with regulations and policies?  Would it be possible to turn the dissemination of policy into something which makes them both strange and suddenly arresting?  If there was, it would make my life a whole lot more enjoyable.

Anyway - here is what I will be explaining about Shklovsky next week - I used pretty pictures to make it look strange...



Popular posts from this blog

2) Introduction to morphemes

So does language begin with words?

No. Language begins with sounds. It is important to understand this first and foremost. We have already raised this point, but it is worth raising again – language begins with sounds!

If I appear to be emphasizing this with a rather bizarre desperation, it is because it would be easy to think that since we are beginning our exploration of language and linguistics with words that this is where language begins. When you think about it logically though, all words are composed of various sounds grouped together. The word ‘cat’ is composed of three distinct sounds - /c/, /a/ and /t/.

So why aren’t we starting with looking at how sounds create language?

Well, in the not-too-distant past, when European football used to be free on the telly, Manchester United or Arsenal would jet off to Spain for a titanic contest with Barcelona. When the commentators referred to Barcelona, they would pronounce it ‘Bar-se-low-nah’ (bɑ:sɜ:ləʊnæ). After a few years th…

6) Places and Manners of Articulation

Place of Articulation
The place of articulation refers to “the point in the vocal tract where the speech organs restrict the passage of air in some way so pro¬ducing distinctive speech sounds” (Finch, 1999). As with manner of articulation, places of articulation are more frequently used to describe consonants than vowels. The following are the principal terms used in linguistics to describe these:



Bilabial.Sounds formed by both lips coming together” (Finch, 1999).Examples include /b/, /p/ and /m/.

'It's owned by Elsevier': Why this is relevant when choosing referencing software

At my University we are currently discussing how to provide support for software that can help students and staff manage their references and sources.  There are of course many different options available on the market - some free, and some not.  During discussions I have made no secret of my preference for Zotero - which I believe offers the most intuitive and comprehensive functionality.  To this end, I have done some showcases of Zotero for various academics - which appear to illicit one of three responses from them:


Oh, brave new world that has such software in it!  I had no idea - and I want it now!We already use it.  Have been for years.  So why are you telling us about it now?But don't we already have Mendeley in our official software catalogue?

I fully expected the first response - but was surprised at the number of people who came back with the second and third.  It is really rather nice to be able to tell academics who fight tirelessly each year to teach academic referen…